This function calculates the health impacts between two scenarios (e.g. before and after a intervention in a health impact assessments) using either the delta or pif approach.
Value
This function returns a list containing:
1) health_main (tibble) containing the main results from the comparison;
impact(numericcolumn) difference in attributable health burden/impact between scenario 1 and 2impact_scen_1(numericcolumn) attributable health impact of scenario 1impact_scen_2(numericcolumn) attributable health impact of scenario 2And many more
2) health_detailed (list) containing detailed (and interim) results from the comparison.
results_raw(tibble) containing comparison results for each combination of input uncertainty for both scenario 1 and 2results_by_geo_id_micro(tibble) containing comparison results for each geographic unit under analysis (specified ingeo_id_microargument)results_by_geo_id_macro(tibble) containing comparison results for each aggregated geographic unit under analysis (specified ingeo_id_macroargument))input_table(list) containing the inputs to each relevant argument for both scenario 1 and 2input_args(list) containing all the argument inputs for both scenario 1 and 2 used in the backgroundscen_1(tibble) containing results for scenario 1scen_2(tibble) containing results for scenario 2
Details
Function arguments
approach_comparison
Please note that the PIF comparison approach assumes same baseline health data for scenario 1 and 2
(e.g. comparison of two scenarios at the same time point).
With the delta comparison approach, the difference between two scenarios is obtained by subtraction. The delta approach is suited for all comparison cases, and specifically for comparison of a situation now with a situation in the future.
Methodology
Information about the methodology (including corresponding equations and literature) is available in the package vignette. More specifically, see chapters:
